TIP572: Finding Value in the Oil Market w/ Josh Young

On today's show, we bring back oil expert Josh Young to give us an update on the oil market. Josh is the chief investment officer and founder of Bison Interest, which focuses on investing strictly in oil and gas equities. During this chat, we cover the highlights of the oil and gas market in 2023. How buff it has shifted his investments in oil, why OPEC is sounding the alarm bells on an oil shortage, the impact of the China reopening on oil demand, Josh's thoughts on the US dumping their SPR reserve while China is building theirs, how a rollover and shale production may impact oil prices, Josh's approach to market timing in the oil market, Josh's view on how his bullish oil thesis may be wrong and so much more. We always enjoy bringing Josh on the show to keep us in the loop of what's happening in the oil market, so with that, here is my chat with Josh Young. You are listening to the Investors podcast, where we study the financial markets and read the books that influence self-made billionaires the most. We keep you informed and prepared for the unexpected. Welcome to the Investors podcast, I'm your host today, Clay Fink, and the audience is in great company today because we bring back Josh Young, Josh, such a pleasure having you back. Thanks for coming on. Thanks for having me on, Clay. Well, today we're going to be covering your favorite topic, which is oil and the energy space. Last time you joined us to chat about why Buffett was betting big on oil and we also chat about things like the Russia Ukraine situation and everything that was happening there. And it's been a bumpy ride in oil. I believe last time the price of oil was around $90 a barrel and today as we're recording we're around $80 or so. So I'd love for you to just hit on some of the highlights on what's sort of happened in the oil market and what's progressed since our last chat. Yeah, it's been really interesting and very bumpy and things went down a lot in between that 90 and today's 82 or so dollars of barrel WCI. So the biggest couple of things in the oil market had been one that Russia actually was adequately supplying the market. Their production and their exports actually didn't fall. How consensus expected and my view was that their exports would have fallen by about a million barrels a day from February of last year to around this time and they did not fall. They've only come down recently because of OPEC cuts. And then the other big sort of negative factor in the oil market has been China's reopening where from a logistical perspective, logistics demand, so gasoline and also jet fuel have actually been pretty strong from a demand perspective. But petrochemicals and to lesser extent diesel demand has been pretty weak. And so the combination of essentially weaker petrochemical demand in China along with stronger exports from Russia and then a bunch of sort of secondary factors in both directions. So Iran and Venezuela have been shipping more oil and various oil products, particularly Iran dumped a bunch of their floating storage in the last year or so. And then various countries either having way worse economies than one would have expected. Like Europe, Germany's economy has been going through a degree of de-industrialization. While on the other hand, India has been growing actually faster than expected. And certain other emerging markets are doing quite well. So I think that's sort of the summary. It's sort of been more negative than positive for the oil market in the last year with those couple of big sort of surprises hurting the market in the short term. But subsequently, there's been multiple OPEC supply cuts. And as OPEC has sort of pulled back on their supplies, that's brought the market back into a deficit. And we're seeing oil prices starting to rise again as instead of Russian production coming offline. We're seeing Russian and Saudi and various other OPEC plus countries with their production coming off. So that's sort of the high level what's happened in the oil market in the last year or so. In our audience, absolutely loved your update on what Buffett was up to last year. Purchase substantial stakes in Occidental and Chevron. I looked up the recent quarter here in Berkshire's stake in Chevron. Now it's at $21 billion in Occidental's around $13 billion. A couple other headlines I caught was that Berkshire has agreed to spend $3.3 billion to boost its stake in a liquefied natural gas export terminal. That's in Maryland. Then they were also making a push for a bill that would see Texas spend at least $10 billion on natural gas-fired power plants to back up its grid. So with his large stakes in the Occidental and Chevron, he's still certainly still seeing value in the energy sector. And the energy sector is actually one of the cheapest sectors right now. It's the cheapest in the S&P 500 on a PE multiple basis. So I'd love to get your comments on what we've seen from Buffett recently, if how much he's been adding to his positions and maybe any other comments related to those other headlines. Yeah, sure. So, as I recall, I think Buffett actually has been selling some of his Chevron while adding to his position in Oxy and just Chevron has performed better as a stock than Occidental Petroleum. My understanding of the investment thesis of Berkshire's investment in Occidental was that it was sort of a higher-cost, higher leverage producer relative to the other large oil and gas publicly traded producers in the US. And so it was sort of a bet on higher oil prices for longer. And then the bet on Chevron was more related to refining as well as just being sort of the leader where it's one of the highest quality companies in the business on the large cap side. So it's sort of interesting seeing Chevron has significant exposure to refining and downstream, whereas Oxy, while they do have a chemical business and they do have some renewal's there predominantly an oil producer. And so it is interesting to see Buffett selling some of his Chevron even though dollars-wise he has more, buying more Oxy and then sort of positioning with just those two stocks essentially in the oil and gas space for Berkshire's portfolio. So all of that is pretty interesting. My interpretation is that Buffett seems to be quite bullish on the price of oil and on the value of oil producing assets and there is maybe less bullish on refining where selling down his stake in Chevron I guess because of their large refining aspect. Also as well as their sort of more demanding valuation, it's been a great bet for Berkshire and has performed really well and the downside of the stock was performed well is sometimes it trades into territory where it's no longer a value purchase and where it might be out of valuation where it merits selling for Berkshire's portfolio. And again, I think we've seen some of that. The other headlines are interesting. I think people forget that Berkshire is sort of a holding company so they have the investments that Buffett makes with the cast and the float from the insurance that his insurance subsidiaries underwrite and then he has all these different specific businesses that Berkshire owns outright. And so the investments in Oxy and Chevron are investments that Buffett seems to be directing personally essentially himself whereas the Berkshire Hathaway Energy subsidiary which is managed by others and Buffett technically oversees it. It's a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway but a lot of those sorts of decisions frankly availability seem like they're big and the billions of dollars are just sort of normal course of business for Berkshire Hathaway Energy which is they would operate I believe regulated and unregulated infrastructure assets in the energy space running all the way from coal to renewables and so investment in natural gas exports attempting to get essentially taxpayer funding for natural gas power plants. I mean that's just sort of the normal course of business for Berkshire Hathaway Energy and I would think that's actually sort of not. It's noteworthy that people don't really understand just how much for example coal power generation Berkshire operates and how much infrastructure they own sort of across the space and how much coal they're transporting at Burlington which is a subsidiary there's I guess technically not in Berkshire Hathaway Energy but similar idea and so it just sort of fits in that they're normal course of business. It's sort of similar to if C's candy launched some other sort of candy line and again different because it's more capital intensive but similar in terms of you have to wonder exactly how much Warren Buffett personally is associated with those sorts of decisions versus you know the occipital petroleum where he's going or I guess he's having oxy CEO fly up to Joe Mohawk but he's meeting with her directly and making that sort of investment decision personally. Since we mentioned natural gas I find it interesting to think about how stable oil prices have been at least relative to some of these other commodities when I look at natural gas that was close to $10 in 2022 and now is around $2.60 some curious if you have any thoughts on the volatility and natural gas and maybe how that relates to oil and even Buffett's businesses as well. Yeah I don't think many people really understand what's going on in natural gas even some of the best natural gas traders ever have sort of bowed out of the market because they think it's too hard and too complicated. You know there are a few folks who have done well sort of betting on the direction for natural gas but it's very hard it's just so many different factors coming into play along with the sort of incredible productivity almost miracle of shell gas in the US and then the associated gas that comes with shell oil activity. So there's many different cross currents as sort of its own whole topic. I'm moderately bullish on gas and you know with oil I think the forward curve is in backwardation which is if you sell a contract if you want to sell your oils or via a futures contract a year out you might sell it for $5 or $10 a barrel less than the current price for the for spot oil if you were selling it today versus selling it via that contract for a year out. If you're selling natural gas in a spot contract today versus a contract a year out you actually could get almost twice the price a year out as you can today. I think the winter 24 is over $4 in MCF whereas the current price like you were saying is just over $2. So there's the forward curve is in contango and I think it actually the forward curve is never right but it's I think pretty close I think probably $4 over the next couple of years as more export terminals come online is probably sort of the right number depending on industrial activity in the US depending on power burn and what the winter and summers are like in the next couple of years as well as you really have to wonder what the impact is going to be of this drop of about 120 rigs from the peak rate of drilling both for oil and natural gas in the US which I think peaked in Q4 last year. You had mentioned that some of the big drivers of oil prices were the production within OPEC what's happening with the relations with Russia and then the China reopening and I think about the OPEC their production cuts and they've kind of been sounding the alarm bells on you know just this under investment in oil and I think about you know maybe what they're incentive sort of our and what their motives are what do you make of OPEC kind of sounding the alarm bells on this under investment and the production cuts as well. Yes so we put out a thesis a couple of years ago that we thought that OPEC had way less spare production capacity than they were claiming and at the time it was very contentious and we were sort of making jokes about there being a bone saw sharpened for me since Saudi Arabia because their history with a reporter who had reported negative things about their regime and it turned out within a month of our publication of our white paper that I think it was the number two executive at Aramco cannot publicly talked about how there was less spare capacity than people thought and he wasn't directing it specifically to Saudi Arabia it was more of a general comment and subsequently everyone from MBS to ABS the Prince of Saudi Arabia to the market to the head energy minister to various folks who are senior at Aramco have all commented on massive under investment in oil in particular and being worried about their being under supply. So I mean I think just the simplest explanation for that is that they're worried about their ability to adequately supply the market and if you're a producer that has you know maybe they have decades of reserves but they're higher cost and they have less of it than they're expecting I think they see a risk that oil prices go so high when there's a market under supply and they're just not able to manage it that actually destroys long-term demand and oil they produce let's say 20 years from now will get will not have a market or will have a much lower price and then I think they're also worried that if there's a huge spike in price again from an inadequately supplied market that it would encourage substantial additional capital investments that could actually bring on much more supply over the long-term. So I think when they say they want more supply I think they want let's say a couple million barrels a day more supply maybe you know extra 30% more activity than you're seeing globally I don't think they wide double or triple the activity levels that you're seeing and again you can't really know for sure but I think it helps to sort of think about that and what it means for a producer of something that's in a cartel that's limiting and supply it to go tell everyone that they need to invest more the one other interesting note this is not our first hand analysis this is second hand from having published our own sort of math on the productive capacities different countries after we publish that and after we sort of disseminated it we had this great benefit and it's a reason why we disseminate our research through white papers and other sorts of mediums including podcast interviews and TV interviews one of the nice benefits is that people reshowed to us who have personal experience in these various fields or who are manufacturing supplies chemicals or equipment or various other things to service these fields or who have worked on them in the past and the feedback that we got was actually we were understating the problem with the productive capacity of fields in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait and various other countries and so again we haven't verified this fully but the one supporting factor is that there's a huge amount of offshore activity using very expensive very sort of advanced rigs by Saudi Arabia as well as by Ramco as well as by other sort of gulf countries and other countries where you would think that they would have adequate or more than adequate available supplies to bring on at very low cost onshore so it's no longer the sort of Beverly Hillbilly's shoe to the ground and oil comes out sort of idea or analog it's totally the other end of the spectrum I think when you see Saudi Arabia going and spending hundreds of thousands of dollars a day per offshore rig and bringing what is it they have 50 years something running right now 55 I mean that should tell you that there's a real issue onshore and that they're concerned it's sort of their actions as Buffett would say you want to look at ignore people say look what they do and what they're doing is investing very heavily in their productive capacity so again that would be sort of confirming that and again it's sort of it's very important I think to try to to stay away from tinfoil hats sort of twilight the desert sort of theories and again like was Matt Simmons right in early or just totally wrong or wrong because he was 20 years early unclear but I think it's really helpful to sort of stay oriented on specific facts and then a simple analysis that is logical and then go get as much feedback as you can on that sort of thing and not make it too complicated is that sort of how we've approached it and again I think there are real capacity limitations and the simplest explanation is probably correct here which is just that there's limited spare capacity in OPEC and it's costing them more than they expected to add capacity and so they're telling other people to do it to avoid some of those larger term problems that I was mentioning. It's very interesting I'm also really curious about the China reopening and how you sort of view this and how it plays into the market with today we see global oil demand at around 101 million barrels per day so you know when China goes off to zero COVID policy and they want to reopen their economy you know I think that's just huge demand coming on the market in terms of you know China being one of the largest economies in the world so could you talk more about this and how this plays into your oil thesis. Yeah so China I mean I'm generally very opposed to mercantilist economies and centrally controlled economies like China's and they have predictable long-term structural issues so when you look at Japan there was a period of significant growth in the Japanese economy and then it sort of hit a wall in the early 90s and basically Japan stalled out for a long period of time so the China bears point to that they point to demographic issues and say hey this is the problem and I don't just agree that there will be problems in China and China is definitely experiencing economic problems but it's also very different in that there's this giant population that has very little energy consumption on a per person sort of the per capita energy consumption is still very very low and there's still even with negative demographics and even with all kinds of other problems there's still enough room there for there to be significant additional growth before having the sort of Japan problem and so it's sort of one of these things where I'm very sympathetic to the China bear case it's just I think it's been too early for a long time and it's still too early so that can caveat out of the way I think China actually played this reopening trade sort of extremely well and where the US was running fiscal and monetary essentially stimulus concurrent with a reopening which was sort of a natural stimulus and where we were essentially bribing businesses and giving government funds to businesses as well as direct payments to individuals as well as suppressed interest rates while the reopening was happening the US China did it different right they haven't done the seam sorts of stimulus that we did they did some of it for a certain period of time but they're reopening they focused almost entirely on the sort of services side they allowed the services side to sort of boom they sustained their real estate market enough that it didn't totally inflow it I mean you had issues at Evergrande and you had a couple of other real estate developers that had issues but they kept it from totally exploding but they were inflating in your perspective but they sort of put it in stasis just something that they let their economy run hot on the services side and now that that services boom is starting to slow they're in the process of working on stimulus and so two other thoughts on that one they're stimulus is shifting now that they've built out plenty of real estate developments I mean there's really not that much of a need for new housing in China at this point given how much they've built versus their demographic trends but they're shifting more towards sort of consumption oriented stimulus which is very positive and then a non-China observation that's very important for Chinese oil demand which is that we're starting to see green shoots in freight demand and freight activity in the US and that consumption of diesel and that those extra trucks and extra real cars are bringing in many cases goods that are manufactured in China and so there's a little bit of a lag effect but I think that the strength of the US the sort of surprising strength of the US economy and this resurgence in freight demand green shoots across trucking and rail as we see inventory restocking I think it could end up being another sort of similar effect for China and when you think about what's suffered in China in terms of diesel-demanded pet camp if you see this pickup in factory activity and other sorts of parts of the industrial economy in China from demand in the US and elsewhere I mean you could see a major economic research in China for a period of time and again I'm not saying this will last braver but there's room for another I don't know somewhere between two and four million barrels a day of incremental oil demand in China above where we see them consuming today whether it's 16 million barrels a day or 17 and a half depending on sort of who you're asking whether it's Jodi or I can't remember the EIA everyone sort of has this sort of bracket of just under 16 million barrels a day on one side in May to 17 and a half or so and then just one last thought on China so when you think about that consumption when you think about sort of the trajectory of that consumption you want to think about their purchases recently of oil to fill up their own strategic petroleum reserves and their own commercial inventories and so that the bear thesis on oil this year had been all their inventories are full and they keep buying anyway what happens when they sell or dump those inventories or refine that oil and then export it and there's two things one they've been building more and more of this storage right and they're not building it for fun and they're probably not building it just to arbitrage of the price of oil they're building it because I think they see what I see and what others see which is this likely scenario where they end up using millions of barrels a day more oil and I think they see what OPEX sees which is they don't know where it's going to come from so if they don't know where it's come from and they know that they're going to need it and they need to stimulate the manufacturing anyway they might as well build a bunch of steel drums and put concrete under them and sell them up with oil and refined products and so I think that's no worthy I think the big thing the China bears get wrong is that there's somehow going to be oil coming out of China the oil goes to China it's getting used in China and they're not just sort of speculating on the price they're they're strategically purchasing it for future consumption and again I just think there's so much noise in there there's so many sort of specific statistics that can look really alarming or really promising and there's just a reality which is these guys they're centrally managing their and centrally planning their economy and they expect to use more oil and therefore they're buying it and storing it and their storage levels are actually pretty stable and they're sort of in the mid 60s or so percent capacity utilization of their storage between technically SPR and commercial inventory so again there's lots of noise but when you look at the specifics and you think about what it means for a country like China to be going and buying more oil and putting it in storage they're buying it to store it to use it and it's likely not for more it's likely not for these other sorts of star fetchings possible but the simplest explanation is just they're buying to use it they see the potential for millions of barrels a day of demand ramp up they don't know where they're going to get it from and so they want to make sure that they have an adequate supply to be able to have some buffer in case prices spike due to some either supply disruption or unanticipated amount let's take a quick break here from today sponsors this is a huge deal for the first time ever investors of all sizes can invest in some of the top private pre IPO companies in the world including those leading the AI revolution fund rise already America's largest direct access alternative asset manager just launched a first of its kind venture capital product that's available for all investors in the timing couldn't be better you've seen the headlines from large language models to autonomous vehicles to disease research AI's impact on the world is moving at light speed if you're an investor you should be asking how AI is going to impact your portfolio with fund rise you can invest in some of the top private pre IPO companies in the world before it would have been virtually impossible to invest in these companies before they went public join the more than two million people already using fund rise by visiting fund rise dot com slash TIP that's FUN DR ISE dot com slash TIP all investments can lead to loss you want to speak a new language but haven't quite got the hang of it meet your language learning match Babel you get a whole kit of effective learning methods that have been developed by real teachers in over 200 language experts you're taught useful everyday phrases for everyday conversation and you can test your pronunciation to beyond the comprehensive lessons on the app you can listen to podcasts or join live online classes with professional teachers to get the best speaking practice Babel is designed for you to break down that barrier that makes you feel self conscious and for your knowledge to become hard wired in that way you feel comfortable and confident speaking the new language with over 10 million subscription sold and 60,000 lessons on the app conversations start with Babel are you ready use our code investor spelled I N V E S T O R and get a 12 month subscription for the price of six months visit Babel dot com slash audio to redeem your code now that's Babel dot com slash audio with code investor you can also find all the info on this limited time offer in our show notes if your business earns millions or even tens of millions of dollars in revenue then you're in luck because it's your time to learn about net suite we get it all businesses run into their own issues you fall behind teams get buried in work and it feels like you're putting out one fire after another in your search for truth if this is you you should know these three numbers 36,000 25 one 36,000 that's the number of businesses which have upgraded to net suite by Oracle net suite is the number one cloud financial system streamlining accounting financial management inventory HR and more 25 net suite turns 25 this year that's 25 years of helping businesses do more with less closer book in days not weeks and drive down costs one because your business is one of a kind so you get a customized solution for all of your KPIs or key performance indicators in one efficient system with one source of truth manage risk get reliable forecast and improve margins everything you need all in one place right now download net suite popular KPI checklist designed to give you consistently excellent performance absolutely free at net suite dot com slash study that's net suite dot com slash study to get your own KPI checklist net suite dot com slash study all right back to the show so the US has been selling off their strategic petroleum reserve while China has it been building there's up how do the the reserve levels compare between the two countries yeah the US SPR is down it looks like 50% or so from its recent high and that's really interesting because there are limitations in terms of how much more you can pull out before you cause structural damage to these caverns it's not like a sealed realm where you can pull it all the way down and fill it all the way up there's some structural limitations to how much you can pull out and maintain the integrity of it but if you look at the trajectory I mean China's been building more of these things and filling them again it's not a calamity it's not they're not full to the brim they have plenty of additional room but they keep building them and selling them about 60 something percent and then their use of oil has been growing so they're their days of storage in terms of the amount divided by them out there using per day has actually not increased by much the US the day storage has collapsed as we've dumped our SPR and then frankly our commercial inventories are starting to fall too and when you net out the structural amount so similar to the SPR you need a certain amount of oil in pipes for the pipelines to actually function you need a certain amount of oil in silos and various other spots just for the normal flows for exports and imports and refiners processing stuff you need just sort of working capital when you net out the working capital of US commercial inventories we're actually at very low levels and I think people just haven't done the math on that there's an extra roughly 100 million barrels or so that's sort of it's counted as inventory but it's just sort of structural it just needs to be there and so we're pretty low on commercial inventories too in addition to scarily low on the SPR one note on that it's okay that we have less than the SPR because we do produce more oil domestically but it still was nice to have and if you look at why we built the SPR there are strategic reasons to have it even if we are a large oil producer at this point and so it's sort of a there's a lot of political arguments on both sides of that but we are in a less secure energy position today than we were a year and a half ago when we had twice as much oil or so in the SPR. Luke Groman on our show he was on with Preston Pish he was kind of sounding the alarm bells on shale rolling over here in the US my pull this Wall Street journal article that was recently published it explained that the US shale production is dropping at its fastest pace since the COVID-19 pandemic. I saw that the number of rigs drilling for oil has dropped from 800 to 670 with private drilling accounting for nearly 70% of that decrease and we've seen US drilling rise and fall in these different waves over the past 20 or so years so I'm curious what your take is on how you know previous declines in the shale production the US how that sort of factors ended the oil price and what history is sort of telling us on this front. I think I have a view but I have it loosely helped because there's a history of people being totally embarrassed by bad calls on shale production growths and declines in both directions and so my current view and this may change because again it's a very complicated subject each of those rigs are drilling specific locations in specific spots they can get shifted to more productive locations or less productive they can get shifted to locations that can produce more oil or more natural gas or more natural gas liquids or some combination of those so so it is a dynamic problem but high level shale productivity on the oil side has been falling over the last few years it may have peaked around 2018 so that's the productivity per rig and essentially per thousand feet of lateral length in the horizontal of these shale wells and it's been falling since then and so as you have declining productivity per well and per thousand feet and as you sort of you hit the upper limits on rig productivity in terms of just how many feet you can drill per day with your rig and again there are some extraordinary people and technologies for that but we are sort of it does look like peeking out on drilling productivity and again watch me totally be wrong on that at some point in the future with some new technology or drilling technique or what have you but I think they're right I think there's a real risk of production declining and we also we put out a bison white paper on this issue of drill on completed wells we call it the duck dilemma and that sort of played out where we saw many more rigs getting added relative to frac stacks of pressure pumping equipment getting added and so we needed more of those rigs just to make up for the under investment and under the there was disproportionately too little drilling activity or versus a pressure pumping activity so that sort of balanced itself out and what we're seeing now is with there being a smaller inventory of drill done completed wells relative to the rate of drilling wells there isn't that sort of flex to bring on additional production very quickly to the extent that we see an oil price spike so there is a little bit of a build up and drill done completed wells on the gas side which makes sense given the shape of the gas forward curve and the fact that you can sell gas right now if you want for 18 months or now we higher than the current price so that's all rational with the backwardation along with just sort of this increase in drilling reactivity and decrease pressure pumping we saw the drill done completed wells sort of go away which means that whatever the error rate is going to be in terms of just shell surprised to the upside or the downside on the oil side it's more likely to surprise on the downside and then it's much less likely to correct as quickly as it did in this sort of post-COVID recovery where you saw production rebound by almost close to 2 million barrels a day over a couple of year period just because you had all these drill done completed wells that you could bring back on where they would go and complete without having to go drill new wells to fully replace them so sort of long answer short probably we're going to have less production than people are still forecasting and we may actually see US oil production decline if we don't see a big step up in rigs as well as pressure pumping units. Since we talked about accidental and chevron I'm curious what you've seen from some of the super majors in terms of production and just some of the big names in the US. It's an interesting question because the industry generally has been under investing relative to its cash flows versus how it's invested in the past so historically the industry would invest about 100% of its cash flow some of the shield producers prior to the I mean even after the 2014 crash running into let's say 2018 they would invest 100% or more of their cash flow and right now they're they're all producing a fraction of that and Buffett has cited that as one of the reasons he's a big buyer of oxy as well as chevron and why he's bullish on oil that under investment of cash flow. Yeah when you look at companies like chevron I mean they're doing a big acquisition which is brilliant because they bought a company at the low end of the valuation spectrum but that was still big enough to be material to them and they bought it for about half of their current valuation and so I think they should go buy more companies and I think chevron has done a really good job through a value perspective in terms of not paying too much when they've done acquisitions and for example when they were in a bidding war with Occidental over in Adarco they actually let oxy win and they won by getting I think it was a billion dollar break see or something like that and they didn't overpay and oxy paid a lot more than chevron was going to pay for Adarco and chevron moved on and they bought other companies for lower valuations so I think chevron is sort of proven that they're good at that and I think they should do more of it and they seem likely to in terms of when you look at their capital programs versus their cash flows exon has a sort of wars track record particularly with onshore shale their xto acquisition was abysmal they had to write down almost a hundred percent of the purchase price over time I think they should still probably buy stuff they're just you know I think they should they probably need to be more cautious and I think the market might might also be more hesitant in terms of seeing them by assets just because of their history that was a little more mixed on the capital allocation side the other interesting thing for both of those companies is that they're well productivity so when you look at their land their land in the Permian in West Texas in southeast New Mexico is top death aisle but their well productivity is average and so they think that they're good at it which is so odd right you hear their comments you talk to services providers and hear what what you know exon and chevron tell the services providers about how good they are and it looks like they just calm themselves versus their own wells which is again it's a very very dangerous thing you want to just you don't want to be and yes of others but in an industrial process you want to not just consider how you're doing it but especially for drilling wells where it's pretty similar you want to compare to other companies too and so it's been this thing where exon particularly was spending a ton of money and trying to grow their production very very rapidly very aggressively and they were not doing a very good job in terms of growing it relative to how much they were spending they have pulled back a lot and their wells are less bad but they're still not impressive and all in my opinion relative to you're just the the resource map when you look at how company are doing on the edges of their core positions in southeast New Mexico I mean it's just not comparable there are way better wells drilled by other operators like EOG immediately adjacent to them so they are investing they are growing a little they're growing their gas and NGL production more than they're growing their oil and they're frankly sort of wasting from my perspective some of the best rock that's out there you know it's bullish for oil but it's sort of one of these very odd things when you hear them talk and again like I'm at the end of their especially chef runs M&A strategy I think some of their offshore stuff especially exons activities in Guiana very promising very high return but they just there was this theory that the oil majors and super majors were going to be the best at shale because they could allocate in most resources and so on it turns out you need to be sort of more entrepreneurial and have the executive team be sort of closer to the ground and more directly involved the cousin the complexity of the processes as well as the number of decisions that need to be made and the amount of authority that needs to be delegated that seems to not be consistent with the cultures that were built around these sort of very large projects with limited numbers of very expensive wells like the activities in Guiana that exons doing I want to briefly zoom out and look at the bigger picture one of the most interesting charts that I've seen recently is the long-term trend of energy consumption ever since around 1950 global energy consumption has just exploded and gone parabolic and coal and oil and natural gas has fueled the majority of that growth in consumption do you envision the demand for oil to just continuously grow over time or remain stagnant I know we don't expect oil demand and gas demand to just increase in the perpetuity so where do you see this energy dynamic sort of you know shifting and playing out how it plays out in the long run so probably hopefully we'll use more energy every year going forward like we have in the past and that growth of energy consumption broadly has been associated with dramatic improvements in lifespan as well as quality of life across humanity so hopefully in places where people use very little energy they'll be able to use more and they'll be able to benefit from basic sanitation basic things like air conditioning and refrigeration I mean these are things that dramatically improve people's lives but they require energy so I hope that that increases I'm concerned about policies that make energy much more expensive and I'm worried that in this sort of tradeoff of climate risk and other risks from using certain fossil fuels versus the risk of undersupplying cheap energy or making energy more scarce to the poorest people who could benefit from things like air conditioning and refrigeration and better transportation for themselves or their crops or whatever other sort of basic needs that they have that can be still by energy I worry that our current sort of policy course is to sort of affect the trajectory of consumption of energy on this chart and so I think it's less of a you know that people say like all of the above and there are energy return on investment issues with some of these sources versus others but I think just holistically policies that promote the production of energy as well as the distribution of it broadly are very pro humanity and the opposite is sort of anti and then just the people that are anti certain energy sources you'll find them on their private jets to conferences where they talk about it so it's a very sort of weird colonial like there's all kinds of open questions I think about what those people actually want and again getting back to budget I think you just look at what people do and ignore what they say and you sort of know what they actually want and I don't know why this conversation doesn't always start anywhere it's not covered in the news like what these people actually do who are trying to restrict energy consumption but again I hope that we continue on that trajectory it's most likely that we continue on this growth of energy consumption this dramatic growth of energy consumption trajectory but I also worry that we're ruled by people who consume enormous amounts of energy themselves but are promoting increased restrictions and scarcity of energy for others to my knowledge your solar and wind energy skeptic I might describe it as so where do you see things sort of transitioning in terms of energy production I'm sure this is something you've talked about before my problem with solar and wind are that the technologies don't seem to be sort of fully perfected from a R&D perspective and so what you have is huge amounts of subsidies on imperfect technologies that are ruled out in a way where you end up consuming polluting fossil fuels in some cases much more polluting right you end up burning more coal or engaging in strip mining in various parts of the world using trial labor very some combination of things that are very non-humanistic along with things that are very polluting to end up with something that doesn't even work that well and so it's not that I have a problem with solar I would love for there to be really highly efficient highly effective solar and for it to be rolled out broadly similar to wind the problem is that it just doesn't work as well as advertised and it somehow became a political thing where observing that or sharing hey this wind turbine blew up and it's on fire or paid cheers what happened to all these wind turbine blades after they were they last for 20 years or 10 years and they get disassembled and here's where they go or this is what happened to this solar field after it was ran through its useful life for somehow that became a political thing instead of just being able to say hey this is a downside of this technology so my hope is that the technologies get improved dramatically through research and development and that there would be more funding oriented towards those improvements rather than to subsidizing the implementation of these imperfect technologies an increasingly less favorable locations so the other problem is you see these pictures of solar panels covered by snow and Alberta and it's like like what are you actually trying to accomplish by burning coal to melt silicon to build your solar panels in China in some cases using weaker like slave labor essentially to then ship it again using oil to the west coast to then put it on a truck and drive it or put on a train and you again use these old to bring it over to install it to have it not run for 80% of the time because you get snowed and then you don't have a lot of sun anyway and so again it's less about the thing right from this great and hopefully gets a lot better and then the actual implementation the idea of personal implementation and the problem I have is on the implementation side and I think when you compare it to oil or natural gas you have huge taxes and regulatory burdens on the implementation of a natural gas solution to something and you have huge subsidies and stimulus is essentially to encourage the consumption and use of the solar solutions and so it should be a really easy economic solution when it's not I think that tells you that there's something wrong so again nothing against it specifically more of a problem of the actual the economics which tell you the effectiveness of the current generations of these things I know you're not one to really try in time the market you post a lot of stuff related to Buffett and you know not trying to time the market or forecast whenever sessions going to happen and I would mention that you're taking advantage of very attractive prices when oil dropped in recent months and since rebounded back above the $80 mark I'm curious with that if you expect oil to perform you know similar to previous recessions where it sort of has a little bit of a free fall before the economy recovers or do you see the current dynamic much differently given you know all the under investment that's been occurring more in such an interesting time that it's really hard to answer that because I don't know that anyone really knows if our economy is booming or if we're in a recession right now and it's like a very a very strange time we sort of know what happened to see years ago but we don't really know what's happening right now people are asking me that about oil and I would say hey more broadly we just don't know right there's a lot of complexity and there's a increasingly inaccuracies in governor reported data along with increasing inaccuracies and company reported data so it's just really hard to say what it looks like right now and again very loosely held it was just sort of like what the data seems to be showing incredible analysis seems to be indicating we had a downturn last year the stock market sort of bottomed in what was it November or so last year we've had a stock market recovery we're seeing freight green shoots we're seeing inventory restocking this sort of looks like a recovery post recession and we also saw oil prices fall essentially 50% from their high to their low which is what you would see in a recession and we're seeing a rebound after that which is again what you would see and so the question of hey what are your recession fears it's like okay well you know I wasn't managing money through the 70s but I was in the 2000s and I got to see how scary and awful it felt in 2009 to be buying stocks particularly oil and gas stocks and everyone just thought the world was ending I remember I attended an event where the chief investment officer for the Disney family office was presenting and discussing and I asked him hey like you actually seem pretty bullish on stocks what's going on and you keep pointed to the inventory restocking and said hey I can't predict the future but I know what's happening right now and valuations in his words were very cheap and there was this increase in economic activity and so again I don't know for sure and there's there's really wide bands on the accuracy of data that we're seeing but right now it actually looks like we may be in a recovery from what may have been a recession last year and I don't really know I just know sort of where oil consumption is I can actually see oil inventories a lot better than I can see some of these other sort of broader economic questions so when I think about the the risk of a recession I look at the trajectory of consumption I look at the things that could affect that and again most of the trajectories of most of those factors are actually positive not negative and the sentiment got really bad for oil in particular earlier this year as it was getting great for tech stocks as it getting great for various other actually quite economically sensitive businesses and no idea is that tech does well in a low growth environment but it does very poorly in a negative growth environment and so for those stocks to be running I mean they were they were indicating there was something right either was a speculative mania or it was that the economy was recovering or or both and so again really hard to say and one of those things where I'm sure some of my econ professors if they see this who I took classes with a year of such a career I'm not going to be thrilled to hear me say this but I just don't know I don't think people know but and like you said value wise there were extraordinary bargains on these stocks still I mean we got to buy them for even cheaper a couple months ago but high level the S&P energy was like 4% of the S&P on a market cap basis but 10% on a earnings basis so that was clearly unsustainable over you up to I think 4.5% right now but that's still way too low and historically if you just bought things on that basis that's sort of one of the budget approaches you just you end up over time converging maybe earnings come down a little and the market caps go up or earnings to go up and your market cap does that more but either way that tends to be a really good trade historically has tended to be and then on the specifics I mean some of the companies because there's so few people looking at it there's so little index participation and then there's just such negativity associated with the space there are mispricings that are just astonishing and it's three years enter a recovery for these stocks you'd think there'd be smart institutional money going for it and you know sub 10 sub 20 million dollar a day trading volume stocks I mean there are just gross mispricings in both directions and we're finding great opportunities let's take a quick break here from today sponsors let's talk about some exciting news goldman sacks reported that families worth over half a billion dollars are adjusting their investment strategies they're taking special interest in collectibles specifically art research shows a portfolio including a five percent allocation to contemporary art has historically driven higher returns versus a traditional portfolio of just 60 percent stocks and 40 percent bonds and today sponsor lets you do just that while I haven't invested myself masterworks art investing platform empowers us to invest in the same paintings available to billionaires at a more accessible price point they've racked up impressive returns of 10 percent 17 percent and 35 percent for work sold this year alone in masterworks has acquired over 300 paintings while past returns are not a guarantee of future returns their 15th exit was just a couple weeks ago and it had a 77.3 percent annualized net return that's right a 77.3 percent annualized return net of fees and expenses just head to masterworks dot com slash billionaires to check it out yourself that's masterworks dot com slash billionaires see important disclosures at masterworks dot com slash disclaimer you want to speak a new language but haven't quite got the hang of it meet your language learning match babble you get a whole kit of effective learning methods that have been developed by real teachers in over 200 language experts your taught useful everyday phrases for everyday conversation and you can test your pronunciation too beyond the comprehensive lessons on the app you can listen to podcasts or join live online classes with professional teachers to get the best speaking practice babble is designed for you to break down that barrier that makes you feel self conscious and for your knowledge to become hardwired in that way you feel comfortable and confident speaking the new language with over 10 million subscriptions sold and 60 thousand lessons on the app conversations start with babble are you ready use our code investor spelled i n v s t o r and get a 12 month subscription for the price of six months visit babble dot com slash audio to redeem your code now that's babble dot com slash audio with code investor you can also find all the info on this limited time offer in our show notes think of your favorite entrepreneur they wouldn't be anywhere without trusted partners if your commerce platform is scaring away potential customers instead of converting them into lifelong fans you have to try Shopify did you know that Shopify powers 10% of all ecommerce in the us and millions of entrepreneurs globally of all sizes in over 170 countries Shopify is the commerce platform that is revolutionizing millions of businesses worldwide it's your no excuses business partner that makes it easy for you to sell without needing to code or design just bring your best ideas and Shopify will help you open up shop in once you've reached your audience Shopify has the internet's best converting checkout to help you turn them from browsers to buyers what I personally love about Shopify is how no matter how big you want to grow Shopify gives you everything you need to take control and take your business to the next level this is possibility powered by Shopify sign up for a $1 per month trial period at shopify dot com slash WSB that's all lowercase go to shopify dot com slash WSB to take your business to the next level today that's shopify dot com slash WSB all right back to the show it's funny because as you're an investor in the markets for a number of years and you look at the big picture and you look at sort of what's happening things always feel really uncertain and a lot of people kind of see that as a bad thing like are we gonna you know in a recession or things gonna turn down but when you're looking for bargains you want uncertainty you want other people to be sort of worried and scared and then you know obviously you obviously should use caution with investing but when everyone else is really uncertain about things like oil prices then someone like you looks at the fundamentals and you're sort of able to take advantage of opportunities other people are you know sort of too scared to dive into and it also reminds me of the Peter Lynch quote believe you're also a big fan of it's where investors you know they lose more money trying to anticipate recessions than in the recessions themselves one more point you mentioned that uh you know investors don't know if the economy's ripping or if we're in a recession or not and price discovery is one of the great signals within the markets it was interesting to me how you've talked about how the oil price can actually sort of be an indicator for the economy oftentimes people people talk about things like the yield curve inversion to judge where we're at in the cycle so I'd love for you to to talk more about oil prices and what oil prices signal for where we may be at within the economic cycle that's a really good question one thing I will add I think up there with uh Buffett and Peter Lynch who both have great investment track records as well as great quotes my friend Morgan Household has this great quote about downturns and he says that every pass downturn looks like an opportunity and every future one looks like a risk so I think it's important to be the frame things the right way and when everyone is scared I like to joke I hide under my desk and click buy and so it's just you've got to be able to just invert it right the more confident I steal in something the more scared I am and the less likely I'm to really go buy more of it or buy it and the less confident but in a way it's really scary but the math just checks out and I can't kill the idea and I can't I can't not buy it in size I mean those are the things that I've done the best in by far and so it's really it's not about it's not about comfort it's not about feel good it's not about sleep at night all those stuff I mean we saw in Canada recently there was a midstream stock that fell they were doing a spinout which looked promising I didn't get involved in it at all but they're doing a spinout and the stock fell I think 15 or 20% on the announcement of a spinout which historically would have actually been an indicator of promising return and you agree that is written extensively about how spinouts sort of unlock value and there's extra returns potentially from buying them both before the spinout and after depending on which one you buy the bigger the remain co or the spinout co and it was just so interesting to see how quickly price can drive narrative and sort of set this like selling loop and then that can reset and you can see a buying loop so it's very very difficult that's relevant for the question which is what does the price of oil mean for the economy and I sort of think not much because when I look at the participation in the futures markets right now for oil it's very low when I look at the physical markets there's very little risk taking by physical market participants and there's very little incentive for folks to buy oil to store it given the shape of the of the forward curve it being in backwardation and so when I look across that I'm not seeing a lot of activity that would suggest that there's a strong price setting in the physical market it looks like it's more being set on the future side and the bulk of that activity seems to be via CTAs and hedge funds that are basically just trading momentum and sentiment and so you have this just sort of game of telephone where it sells sell sell sell sell and then someone mishears sell is buy bye bye bye bye bye bye so I actually don't think there's very much information right now in the price of oil especially relative to where there might have been more information in the price in the past so not saying much I mean over $80 a barrel but having said all that probably we're not in a recession but we may be in a inflationary recession and inflationary recessions cause they say monetary illusions like you sort of have weird things happen when you're in periods of inflation that are higher than recent past periods and so sort of a little bit of the mess but just generally I don't think there's that much information in the price at the moment relative to the broader economy when looking at some of the opportunities you've been diving into you and Trey talked about this quite a bit in your last discussion when talking about Buffett's picks and you highlighted how you know Buffett's managing large tranches of capital and he's sort of forced into these super majors even though they're trading at higher multiples than some of the small caps can you talk about what investors should keep in mind when they're thinking about small caps versus the super majors because you know I think about how smaller companies are probably more susceptible to price swings they probably need to be a little bit more conservative in some ways so can you talk about that yeah I had to eat crowing that a little bit because the super major stocks have done a lot better in the last year than the small caps why is that I mean it's not valuation because the super majors went from expensive when we talked a year ago to more expensive now and you see that shift where Buffett has been actually selling Chevron it looks like so I think there's not that's not accident I think that's again valuation driven I don't know for sure but I don't remember that he's talked about that specifically but you just you see it so I don't know it could be that there's been fund flows towards large cap stocks generally in the US and so as you have S&P 500 index fund flows you end up with sort of structural buying of some of these stocks particularly the largest ones and so you X on a Chevron they ironically be getting bit up partly because Apple and Amazon and Google are in Microsoft are all doing really well and you're sort of they're all time highs or at their all time highs and so you know it could just be that where there's sort of these incremental purchases it could be from share buybacks and it could also be that there are folks who are more interested in making the oil macro bet through equities rather than through buying oil and if they end up buying XLE which is that S&P 500 index fund focused on or ETF focused on the energy sector 50% of that is X on and Chevron so folks that are looking for that sort of broader diversified exposure through an ETF end up owning just a whole bunch of mostly X on and Chevron so those are some possible theories I mean we're just we're in a market where I think we're at near record levels of concentration in a very small number of stocks and in the largest stocks sort of like the nifty 50 or you know like the Cisco's and a few other stocks in the 90s and in those time periods you saw large companies that weren't even in that sort of set of most favored companies you saw their shares trade up a lot so that's my guess I don't think it's related to fundamentals the fundamentals of those businesses versus smaller or mid cap oiling stocks have not really there's been some benefit to refining but refining margins are starting to solve again I don't know that there's really big differentiation I think the one comment on risk and again none of this is a recommendation people should do their own diligence and consult their own financial advisors but there are companies that are small that are very low fundamental risk and fundamental risk measured as solvency questions and viability questions I mean there's companies that I've talked about before that have hundreds of millions of dollars of net cash on their balance sheet and no debt and positive free cash flow and so it's like okay like how do you kill a company that you could right video be really really hard and I don't know that being smaller but having half or a third of your market cap and net cash really makes you more risky like technically it's more risky from a share price volatility measurement perspective but it's not from a fundamental perspective so I think I think there's some complexity there and then I think I just worry that people end up missing even though small cap stocks have done for me I guess one change in the last year were it allowed to talk about our returns again it's not a solicitation but I think it's illustrative for the difference in between small and large cap so XLE launched in May of 2015 XLE I think is up maybe 10% or so since then and the small cap oil and gas stock index the S&P 600 energy is down last I checked about 65% or so then the ETF is down about the same and we're up like 115% net of all fees and expenses and whatever and so there's room to do really well in small caps because there's so big differences and valuations there's really wide valuation dispersion and there's just less room I think to earn differentiated returns on the large cap side because everyone knows about XOn and Shepron and Shell and BP I mean there's just a limited set of these very large companies and very little differentiation possible I think in the research and tons of cell side notes on these companies and just there's just less of information asymmetry available so I think even seeing out performance by large caps over a period of time even if it was over a long period of time that doesn't necessarily mean that there are orange opportunities and small caps to or micro caps or mid caps to materially outperformed even when that sector is is out of favor and then when it goes back into favor if it goes back into favor there's room for even more exceptional returns in that sort of strategy. Are there big differences in the break even price between the larger super majors in the small caps or how do you think about that aspect? Yeah sometimes but there's also big differences in break evens among small caps between one small cap to another and so there's supposed to be I wrote some articles during COVID about how COVID sort of challenged the super major business model the Rockefeller sort of came up with this model where through integration it made the super major model that that design of business sort of bulletproof because they were supposed to when oil prices went down they were supposed to make more on refining when refining was doing bad along with oil they would make more on chemicals they would make money on transportation and these companies have sort of shifted away from that to some extent and so while there's some brilliance to the model that Rockefeller created it's not as bulletproof today and there's not as much stability as there was for standard oil I mean he also had the benefit of running a monopoly but even the monopoly constituents when they got broken up still did extraordinarily well for a long period of time so I know it's sort of a tangent but I think it's important in thinking about it it's not obvious that mega cap company in the oil and gas space will necessarily have lower break evens than a small cap or micro cap company it all depends on the specifics of the assets the specifics of the business strategy and then the other aspect is what will the incremental returns on invested capital look like and what are the opportunities within those companies to earn those high returns because the way you make money as a company over time and in the ways stocks outperform over time is through displaying high return on equity return on invested capital you really want those measures to be very high and there's a lot of research showing over the long run that's sort of the biggest single factor and so you know these companies have big benches right excellent has piana they have this great land in west Texas in southeast New Mexico similar for Chevron with some great offshore opportunities as well as some of the best land in southeast New Mexico but if they're not effectively addressing them and if they're not sort of rebuilding that inventory you can have small companies that actually earn for in excess return on equity over time and those companies again statistically should do better because they have that better return opportunity and then they're also smaller so they can be more nimble more flexible and it's a reason I think why in past cycles small caps have actually traded at pretty large premiums of arm evaluation perspective from cash flow and so on to larger companies and so I think there is a reasonable case that we'll see that reversion from a big discount for small caps to a premium and a big part of that I think is just this opportunity to find to be more nimble and be able to find mispriced opportunities that an ex-owner Chevron just can't address because they're too big and it just takes too much change to to refocus their capital. I'm really glad he mentioned the return on capital and the importance of that and oil is just a really really tough business a lot of stocks just don't go anywhere because stocks might do well over one or two years as the oil price goes up but over a long enough time frame the return on equity return on capital for a lot of those businesses is a very high which is why probably a lot of investors just don't park their money into the oil sector so Josh part of being a great investor your big believer in Buffett's idea of value investing investing with the margin of safety investing in companies with strong return on capital part of being a great investor is understanding what can go wrong so I'd love for you to talk more about if there's a feasible scenario in your thesis on oil a scenario where the thesis doesn't pan out say over a five year time frame what does that look like? I think the biggest risk to my thesis which is finding small cap companies that are materially undervalued and owning them for the repricing close to fair value the biggest risk there is that there's some giant discovery of new oil that oversupplies the market whether it's through a big discovery you have to discover a lot you have to find a really big field that could come on really fast and the history is not very promising for that the last truly big fields were some of these shield fields which from discovery to ramp up were a decade plus so you need something much faster than that maybe you have to be a discovery in an existing field such that there's enough infrastructure in place to be able to adequately supply the market for you'd need an absolutely devastating economic downturn that would have to be global and would have to look like some of the stuff that we saw in the 30s with countries essentially going off the grid by going communist or a sort of similar type you just absolutely torching their industrial bases and torching their consumption of basic materials including energy and so that's a and it's not a there's a there's a non-zero probability of that and it has happened in the past which means the history doesn't repeat what arrives and we are in an unstable uncertain time so that is a risk I don't think it's very likely but between those two I think those would be sort of the biggest risks that I could see that are our non-zero and would have sort of the biggest and I guess that the last one would be another sort of pandemic so another either terrible COVID wave or some other sort of thing that would necessitate sort of lockdowns that might be more permanent than what we saw in this last wave and that doesn't seem as likely to me because it seems like there's just sort of general public resistance to that and I think if the government said tomorrow everyone needs to lock down I think you might actually see significant civil disobedience and maybe just that not stick I mean we're even seeing that in China at some point where the Chinese people were just saying they were actual like protests and in some cases riots and that's very unusual for China the scale that they saw it so not likely but again any of those three things are left-tailed risks nothing is certain there's always risk in any sort of investment and the lessons from the Buffets and Peter Lynch's or the Rother that you you have to you want to do when you can to minimize your risk but you have to take risk in order to earn above market or even a market return and if you don't take that risk then you won't earn a great return. I had one more question for you Josh one thing that's been on my mind is the impact of higher interest rates on this industry we've seen you know the US selling off their SPR and it's put downward pressure on oil and higher interest rates of course make it more expensive for these companies to go out and invest in new production assuming they're taking on debt. Has higher interest rates played as big of a role as investors sort of anticipated or what are you seeing on this front? So high level it was a giant mistake for the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates in the way they did and it was a similarly terrible decision by the ECB and other global banks to do the same thing and so the reason I say that is that higher interest have suppressed capital investment and we had a supply problem from sort of pandemic after effects and under investment and the solution from a central bank perspective has been to kill demand and as we saw with that chart that you showed for energy there's a natural tendency for demand for energy to increase and so the solution from a humanitarian perspective is to supply more energy and not to kill demand for it because killing demand for energy is very bad it kills people it ruins their lives it's really bad and so we're seeing that right rigged counts are down a lot since interest rates have risen and again partly that's commodity price driven but it's also capital availability driven which is a direct interest rates are direct proxy for capital availability we've seen inventory destocking so wall you've seen inventory's increase in China which appear to be strategic and economic we're seeing oil inventory's falling in the US falling sort of globally X China and that sort of destocking along with lower capital expenditures they increase the fragility of sort of the energy supply chain so we have less investment to bring on new supply than we had prior to some of these large interest rate increases and especially relative to where we are at from a commodity price perspective and then we also have a destocking of image worries and I thought one of the lessons from covid was that you wanted to have not just in time inventory you wanted to hold some extra in case of some sort of disruption and it appears that I was mistaken and businesses right now that have destocked were correct clearly because nothing has gone wrong since covid with inventory but you know when the next thing happens then we'll find out that inventory's were important again so so yes I think there have been significant effects from it and it's one of those weird things where I think in the end I make more money from this terrible policy error I made more money from the policy error of low interest rates and I think value stocks and small cap stocks will do very well in the context of a higher rate environment with lower capital investment but it's really unfortunate to sort of see I'd rather make a little less money and make it through stock selection and finding great opportunities then having some sort of like terrible policy failure macro tailwind we have it which I guess is good for oil and gas investments but it's I think we should have more investment and interest rates being higher are really constraining that and frankly even on the solar and windside alternatives outside of stimulus and subsidies higher rates are dramatically reducing investment in those categories as well and again I'm not a huge fan of those in their sort of current context but I do think that we need more energy and it is unfortunate to see demand for alternatives get hurt by higher rates and again there are there are subsidies and stimulus and so on for for the the purchase and manufacturer and installation of those but higher rates sort of counteract that to some extent and they cut down dramatically on projects that aren't beneficiaries of stimulus. Josh thank you thank you so much for coming back on the show I always enjoy getting your insights and it's great to finally have the chance to meet you before we close it out I want to give you a chance to give the handoff for our audience how they could get in touch with you and in any other resources you like to share here. Sure yeah thank you I really appreciate it it's awesome to be with the beyond your guys your guys show people can find me at licenseinterest.com we have a email list where we share various things we find interesting on a sort of monthly or so basis and then you can also find me on twitter the bison twitter is at bison interests you find my twitter where I share too many random investment and energy investment thoughts energy energy thoughts Josh underscore one and always happy to hear from people and get feedback and you know really it's it's an honor to be honest thank you very much quick you bet thanks again Josh thank you for listening to TIP make sure to subscribe to millennial investing by the investors podcast network and learn how to achieve financial independence to access our show notes transcripts or courses go to the investors podcast.com this show is for entertainment purposes only before making any decision consultant professional this show is copyrighted by the investors podcast network written permission must be granted before syndication or report casting